From the desk of Will Wright, Hon. AIA LA
Director of Government & Public Affairs

Housing as Community

Recently, I had the opportunity to hear Karen Kubey, the author of Housing as Intervention, share a presentation about an affordable housing project in the South Bronx. She said two sentences that I think resonate deeply with exactly where we are right now, especially here in Los Angeles.

“Housing justice is racial justice.”

“Housing is healthcare.”

But what is meant by the word ‘housing’? ‘Housing’ needs a new hone, a magnetic flip, and we need an entirely new approach to how we understand the purpose, value, and reverence of a home. A definition that recognizes that housing is a human right and that a home is essential for human health and dignity.

Lets un-think housing as an investment strategy and start to recognize that housing is a safe place to find nourishment and shelter, to recharge, rejuvenate, to think and relax, and a place to serve one’s purpose.

Housing, not as an investment property, but housing as healthcare, housing as a place of belonging, supporting, and celebrating your connection to community.

To achieve that, we’ve mapped out the following policy recommendations:

· To advocate for housing as a human right.
· To synchronize the multiple design guidelines specifications mandated by numerous levels of affordable housing funding sources so that architects follow one comprehensive set.
· To reform the site-plan review and the entitlement process with greater flexibility so that it correlates with the timeline for acquiring affordable housing project financing.
· To allow 100% multi-family housing in every commercial zone. We have an over-abundance of ground floor retail.
· To allow a minimum 3:1 FAR and 45 feet for every parcel zoned for multi-family projects wherever and whenever they’re permitted via a community plan.
· In zones where multi-family is permitted, to exempt multi-family housing from CEQA review, as well as from ‘discretionary’ review. To set planning and design standards in the community planning process and move compliance review to Building & Safety Departments.
· To let the market determine multi-family amenities such as parking, private open space, unit size and product diversity rather than through the regulatory processes.
· To end ‘exactions’ which will lower housing costs by separating political decisions about housing projects from decisions about land-use, open space, parks and transportation policy.
· To end project “mitigation” of transportation impacts, and instead, establish and fund transportation policy in a separate, regional process.
· To establish a statewide inclusionary housing policy, which will level the playing field and provide greater certainty for the funding and underwriting markets.
· To update Costa-Hawkins to establish a state-wide reasonable, rolling time-period for when older apartments may become rent-controlled while keeping vacancy de-control.
· To update Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) goals for the amount of housing needed to reduce prices over time & mandate compliance.
· To promote density-bonus incentives in order to encourage the development of workforce housing (80% to 120% AMI).

CEC: Letter of Support

AIA California signed onto a coalition letter supporting the California Energy Commission’s decision to continue improving Title 24. There are some groups who oppose the proposed changes to Title 24 and seek to delay these changes to the next building code cycle. The coalition letter supports the direction the CEC is taking and encourages it to continue on this path.

In late February, the Energy Commission (CEC) released their pre-rulemaking draft language for the 2022 Title 24 Building Code. This became one of the final few opportunities to comment on draft language before the code proposal becomes less malleable.

The most recent draft includes substantial improvements from previous Title 24 pre-rulemaking proposals to encourage all-electric construction, including:

+ Updated space and water heating electric baselines that will require at least 1 electric appliance in each climate zone (and generally the bigger of the space and water heating appliances in most of the high-construction zones)
+ All-electric readiness measures for space heating, water heating, stoves, and dryers
+ Differentiated range hood ventilation requirements for gas and electric stoves for both residential and multifamily construction
+ Electric heat pump space and water heating baselines in schools

CEC’s proposal provides meaningful incentives for electrification which should result in most of the market transition to all-electric over the next code period, while giving builders flexibility to transition at their own pace.


AIA California Climate Action via Code Change

AIA California has made environmental stewardship and climate action central to its strategy and actions. Climate change requires urgent attention, a perspective that is supported by the fact that 1700 + governments around the world that have declared a climate emergency.[1] Considered through this lens, even something as seemingly mundane as code development takes on new importance. This shift was presaged in 2018, when the AIA’s Blue Ribbon Panel for Codes and Standards issued a groundbreaking report that outlines a bold new vision of building codes and standards as valuable design tools for a resource constrained and climate challenged future.[2]

Until recently, this connection between codes and climate action may have seemed somewhat abstract. Code development follows a step by step, carefully meticulous path; as a result, code change tends to be slow, incremental and very fine grained. Broad sweeping moves that might seem best suited for the rapidly escalating climate emergency are not typically part of code development. On the other hand, the code and regulatory environment impacts every building project from new to retrofit, from small to large, so a shift of the entire building industry toward a low and zero carbon framework by definition must intersect with code and regulatory development.

In 2019, AIA California expanded its climate action agenda to address code changes. Two bold code change petitions were submitted to California’s Building Standards Commission on behalf of AIA’s 11,000 architect and allied professional members. In fall 2020, these two code changes began the long process of vetting, hearings, debate and refinement that will lead to the 2022 California Building Code. Following is a brief summary of these proposals.

AIA CA Code Change Petitions for the 2022 California Building Code

ZEROcode integration into CalGreen: Developed by the nonprofit Architecture 2030 organization – a world leader in climate action innovation – the ZEROcode has recently been made part of the International Building Code’s Energy Conservation Code for 2022 as an optional appendix. AIA California has worked with Architecture 2030 on the creation of a California specific version of the ZEROCode. We have petitioned the California Building Standards Commission to make this a part of California’s codes for commercial construction via the 2022 California Green Buildings Standards Code (CalGreen). As proposed, this would be California’s first zero carbon compliance tool available as an option for local adoption.

Amendment of the California Existing Building Code to incorporate all three compliance paths that exist in the 2022 International Existing Building Code.

The International Existing Building Code is unique among the ICC national codes in having a focus on flexibility, presenting users with three compliance paths from which to choose. Each of these paths — Prescriptive, Work Area, and Performance — lead to safe, code compliant buildings. Their differences allow design professionals to match the code path to the unique circumstances a particular existing building challenge can present. Like all ICC Codes, the IEBC has been developed over many years in a national open, transparent, consensus environment. Thus, its provisions are well vetted and are already in use across the United States.

The California Existing Building Code does not include these options. This lack of code flexibility in California makes reuse and retrofit of our existing building stock less feasible due to higher costs and greater uncertainty. It also deprives us some of the benefits that come from updating, reusing and retrofitting existing buildings.

AIA California is advocating for expansion of the CEBC to include all of IEBC’s provisions. This will encourage and support renewing and repurposing more of our existing building stock. The revised code will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by leaving intact vast stores of embodied carbon. It will also encourage California design professionals and their clients to leverage existing infrastructure, increase our housing stock, and boost local economies with well-paying jobs.

What You Can Do Now:

We have provided the letter of support to the California Energy Commission relative to the Zero Code initiative to Peter Strait or to the CEC docket ( with reference to CalGreen 2022 Code). Please send a letter of support for the expansion of the CEBC to:

‘’ and with cc to Mark Christian (; or log on to the hearing on March 29th here: California Existing Building Code Focus Group Meeting — March 29, 2021

Focus Group Agenda/Notice(PDF)

For more information and how to support this initiative via AIA CA’s robust COTE team, email

Michael A. Malinowski, FAIA

Design Review Sessions w/ LACP Urban Design Studio

We have 30+ design review sessions confirmed for 2021.

CLICK HERE to learn more about the program and RSVP for the dates you’re available.